Skip to content

// Industry

Healthtech AI development

AI for clinical and healthtech products, where a wrong answer isn't a bad UX — it's a safety issue. Grounded, evaluated, and auditable.

// The problem

Why this is hard

In healthtech, a plausible-but-wrong answer isn't a UX bug — it's a clinical risk. The hard part isn't calling a model, it's proving the output is faithful to the source, keeping patient data private, and leaving an audit trail a regulator (and a clinician) will trust. Demos that skip that never make it past review.

// What matters here

The capabilities that move the needle

// Deep dives

Going deeper for healthtech

// Proof

Shipped in production

HealthtechClinical RAG

hallucinated citations in eval

0

on the citation eval set

source-linked answers

100%

every shipped answer

Read the case study

// FAQ

Common questions

Answers are composed only from retrieved sources with citations, and an eval suite scores faithfulness on every change — an unsupported answer fails the gate rather than reaching a clinician. Ambiguous cases escalate to a human.

Yes — we design for data privacy, access control, and an audit trail from the start, and can run models in your environment (including open/local models) where patient data can't leave it.

Every step is traced end-to-end, so a given answer is reconstructable — what was retrieved, which model, which version — rather than a black box.

// Related

All industries

// Let's build

Building AI for healthtech?

Tell us where you are. We reply within a day with a concrete next step.