Skip to content

// Industry

Legal AI development

AI for legal — document review, research, and drafting grounded in the source, with citations you can check.

// The problem

Why this is hard

In legal, a confident hallucination is a sanction risk — a fabricated citation isn't a bug, it's a filing you can't make. AI genuinely helps with review, research, and drafting, but only if every claim traces to a real source you can check, confidential material never leaks, and a person stays in the loop on anything that matters.

// What matters here

The capabilities that move the needle

// Proof

Shipped in production

LegalContract review

first-pass review time

-70%

vs. full manual read-through

clauses linked to source

100%

every flag cites the exact text

Read the case study

// FAQ

Common questions

Answers are composed only from retrieved sources with citations back to the passage, and an eval suite checks citation support — an unsupported claim fails the gate rather than reaching a document. A lawyer reviews before anything is used.

Yes — we scope access tightly and can run models in your environment or under data terms that keep privileged material from leaving it, so confidentiality isn't traded for capability.

Always — the workflow is built so AI drafts and surfaces, and a person reviews and decides. Automation is bounded to research and first drafts, not final judgement.

// Related

All industries

// Let's build

Building AI for legal?

Tell us where you are. We reply within a day with a concrete next step.